Fast, scoped review
Snapshot Review
Focused review with a written findings list for the highest-risk flows.
- Web
- Mobile Web
- iOS
Blind-led accessibility audits for websites, portals, mobile apps, and customer-facing documents.
Services
Guidepost Accessibility offers a small set of services built around scope, evidence, and follow-through. If you are unsure where to start, the right first step is usually the task that carries the most customer or operational risk.
A good starting point
Fast, scoped review
Focused review with a written findings list for the highest-risk flows.
Comprehensive engagement
Detailed audit with issue documentation, methodology notes, and fix planning.
Native mobile, treated as first-class
Native mobile review with VoiceOver and TalkBack findings from day one.
Fixes, retests, and iteration
Follow-up support for teams fixing and retesting documented issues.
Public-facing trust layer
A public scope record and accessible badge tied to review dates and status.
Compare services
Each offer is built around a different level of depth and follow-through, but they all start with clear scope, human review, and documentation a team can actually use.
| Service | Best for | Primary output | Typical cadence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Snapshot Review | Small SaaS teams triaging sign-up, login, or billing friction | A scoped findings memo and priority list for the agreed flow or surface | Best when the team needs a focused decision-making document rather than a full audit |
| Full Accessibility Audit | Teams with multi-step account, support, or checkout flows | A full audit report paired with a detailed issue log across the reviewed scope | Best for multi-flow reviews with a planned delivery and follow-up cycle |
| Mobile App Accessibility Audit | Teams shipping native iOS or Android products | A mobile findings set with assistive-technology notes across the included app flows | Best for launch readiness, redesigns, or post-release hardening on native apps |
| Remediation Support | Lean teams with accessibility work alongside existing product roadmaps | Remediation guidance and retest follow-up tied to the findings already in play | Best after a report has landed and the team is actively working through fixes |
| Verification Badge and Verified Scope | Teams that want to communicate active accessibility work responsibly | A public verification page and accessible badge markup linked to the reviewed scope | Best once the review scope and dates are stable enough to communicate publicly |
Testing coverage
Testing can include Windows, macOS, iOS, and Android, with Chrome, Edge, Firefox, and Safari where relevant.
Applied where relevant to the requested scope so the review reflects the environments people actually use.
Applied where relevant to the requested scope so the review reflects the environments people actually use.
Applied where relevant to the requested scope so the review reflects the environments people actually use.
Applied where relevant to the requested scope so the review reflects the environments people actually use.
Mobile app coverage
iOS accessibility audits with VoiceOver behavior, focus order, and control labeling review
Android accessibility audits covering TalkBack, navigation state, and gesture alternatives
Onboarding, login, account setup, upgrade, and in-app settings flows
Dynamic screen changes, dialog behavior, and native form interactions
Need help choosing?
If you are deciding between a snapshot review, a deeper audit, or a mobile-specific engagement, the intake form is the easiest way to shape a right-sized starting point.